Vibrations make large landslides flow like fluid

4 April 2016

Joint Release

WASHINGTON, DC — A new study may finally explain why some landslides travel much greater distances than scientists would normally expect. A team of researchers used a sophisticated computer model to show that vibrations generated by large slides can cause tons of rock to flow like a fluid, enabling the rocks to rumble across vast distances.

The new study was accepted for publication today in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

This May 2014 landslide in Mesa County, Colorado was more than 3 miles long, a half-mile wide and as deep as 250 feet. New research helps explain how these large slides are able to run out so far.<br /> <em>Credit: Jon White/Colorado Geological Survey.</em>

This May 2014* landslide in Mesa County, Colorado was 2.8 miles long and covered almost a square mile of the West Salt Creek valley. New research helps explain how these large slides are able to run out so far.
Credit: Jon White/Colorado Geological Survey.

The “runout” distance of most landslides – the distance debris travels once it reaches flat land – tends to be about twice the vertical distance that the slide falls. So if a slide breaks loose a half-mile vertically up a slope, it can be expected to run out about a mile. But “long-runout” landslides, also known as sturzstroms, are known to travel horizontal distances 10 to 20 times further than they fall, according to Brandon Johnson, an assistant professor of Earth, environmental and planetary sciences at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, and lead author of the new study.

“There are a few examples where these slides have devastated towns, even when they were located at seemingly safe distances from a mountainside,” Johnson said. One such example was a slide in 1806 that slammed into the village of Goldau, Switzerland, and claimed nearly 500 lives.

“It has been known for more than a century that very large, dry landslides travel in a fluid-like manner, attaining speeds of more than 100 miles per hour, traveling tens to hundreds of kilometers from their sources and even climbing uphill as they overwhelm surprisingly large areas,” said Jay Melosh, distinguished professor of Earth, atmospheric and planetary sciences and physics at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, a coauthor of the study. “However, the mechanism by which these very dry piles of rock obtained their fluidity was a mystery.”

Scientists developed several initial hypotheses. Perhaps the slides were floating on a cushion of air, or perhaps they ran atop a layer of water or ice, which would lower the friction they encountered. But the fact that these types of landslides also occur on dry, airless bodies like the Moon cast doubt on those hypotheses.

In 1979, Melosh proposed a mechanism called “acoustic fluidization” to explain these long runouts. Slides of sufficient size, Melosh proposed, would generate vibrational waves that propagate through the rock debris. Those vibrations reduce the effect of friction acting on the slide, enabling it to travel further than smaller slides, which don’t generate as much vibration. The mechanism is similar to the way a car is more likely to slide if it’s bouncing down a bumpy road as opposed to rolling along a smooth one.

In 1995, Charles Campbell from the University of Southern California created a computer model that was able to replicate the behavior of long-runout slides using only the dynamic interactions between rocks. No special circumstances like water or air cushions were required. However, due to the limitations of computers at the time, he was unable to determine what mechanism was responsible for the behavior.

“The model showed that there was something about rocks, when you get a lot of them together, that causes them to slide out further than you expect,” Johnson said. “But it didn’t tell us what was actually happening to give us this lower friction.”

For the new study, Johnson was able to resurrect that model, tweak it a bit, and run it on a modern workstation to capture the dynamics in finer detail. The new model showed that, indeed, vibrations do reduce the effective friction acting on the slide.

The amount of friction acting on a slide depends in part on gravity pulling it downward. The same gravitational force that accelerates the slide as it moves downslope tends to slow it down when it reaches flat land. But the model showed that vibrational waves counteract the gravitational force for brief moments. The rocks tend to slide more when the vibration reduces the friction effect of the gravitational force. Because the vibrational waves affect different rocks in the slide at different times, the entire slide tends to move more like a fluid.

The results of the new model are consistent with the acoustic fluidization idea that Melosh had proposed nearly 40 years ago, before computer power was adequate to confirm it.

“Campbell and I had a long-standing friendly rivalry and he did not believe my proposed acoustic fluidization mechanism could possibly explain his findings in the simulations,” Melosh said. “As a result of Brandon’s careful analysis of the interactions of the rock fragments in the simulations, we’ve now put to rest the debate, and it was a lot of fun for the three of us to work together.”

Ultimately, the researchers hope this work might be a step toward better predicting these types of potentially devastating landslides.

“I would suggest that understanding why these landslides run out so far is really is a first step to understanding when and where they might occur in the future,” Johnson said. “Our work suggests that all you need is enough volume to get these long runouts. This leads to the somewhat unsatisfying conclusion that these slides can happen nearly anywhere.”

The results may also help scientists understand other types of events. For example, acoustic fluidization might play a role in slippage along fault lines, which contributes to large earthquakes.

“This emergent phenomenon, arising from the simple interactions of individual particles, is likely at play whenever large movements of rock occur,” Johnson said.

*NOTE: The original caption for this image incorrectly stated the year this landslide occurred. The correct year is 2014. It has been updated with collaboration from Brown University. 

###

The American Geophysical Union is dedicated to advancing the Earth and space sciences for the benefit of humanity through its scholarly publications, conferences, and outreach programs. AGU is a not-for-profit, professional, scientific organization representing more than 60,000 members in 139 countries. Join the conversation on FacebookTwitterYouTube, and our other social media channels.


Notes for Journalists
This research article will be open access for 30 days from the date of publication. A PDF copy of the article can be downloaded at the following link: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015JF003751/pdf

After 30 days, journalists and public information officers (PIOs) of educational and scientific institutions who have registered with AGU can download a PDF copy of the article from the same link.

Journalists and PIOs who have not registered with AGU may order a copy of the final paper by emailing a request to Lauren Lipuma at llipuma@agu.org.

Please provide your name, the name of your publication, and your phone number.

Neither the paper nor this press release is under embargo.

Title

“The reduction of friction in long runout landslides as an emergent phenomenon”

Authors:
Brandon C. Johnson: Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A.;

Charles S. Campbell: Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.;

Jay Melosh: Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.A.

Contact Information for the Authors:
Brandon C. Johnson: Brandon_Johnson@Brown.edu, + 1 (401) 863-5163


AGU Contact:

Lauren Lipuma
+1 (202) 777-7396
llipuma@agu.org

Brown University Contact:
Kevin Stacey
+1 (401) 863-3766
kevin_stacey@brown.edu

Purdue University Contact:
Elizabeth Gardner
+1 (765) 494-2081
ekgardner@purdue.edu