Bacteria can use nitrogen in soil to steady shaking ground, offering an eco-friendly alternative to some current soil stabilization techniques.
9 December 2022
AGU press contact:
Liza Lester, +1 (202) 777-7494, [email protected] (UTC-5 hours)
WASHINGTON — Naturally occurring microbes could help stabilize the ground under buildings during earthquakes due to the way they reduce the water content in soils, according to new research. This novel microbe-based technique costs half as much and results in far lower carbon emissions than existing soil stabilization methods, as researchers will present at AGU’s Fall Meeting 2022 in Chicago and online everywhere Dec. 12–16.
Shaking during earthquakes causes soils to liquefy, or act like a liquid. Liquefaction makes soil lose its strength and rigidity, which leaves buildings and other structures susceptible to collapse. One existing approach to stabilizing liquefaction-prone soils is permeation grouting, in which concrete is injected into the soil under vulnerable structures to cement the ground together. But this method is heavily reliant on groundwater — a scarce resource in some quake-prone regions such as California — and indirectly releases a substantial amount of carbon dioxide via cement production.
An alternative, potentially more eco-friendly method, called microbially induced desaturation, lets nature do the work. When soil bacteria consume nitrogen, nitrogen gas is released into the soil, filling up the space between sediment grains. This gas-filled soil acts like a shock absorber when earthquakes happen, so the soil doesn’t liquefy.
Video: An accelerated video of gas production from denitrifying, or nitrate-removing, bacteria within a soil sample over time. Areas where the blue dye lightens in color are where gas bubbles are being produced, displacing groundwater and desaturating the soil.
Scientists can amp up this process by injecting nitrogen-rich compounds called nitrates into the soil. Bacteria then eat it up, producing significant volumes of extra nitrogen gas, resulting in a lower risk for liquefaction.
Previous studies through field trials and modeling have shown the method is effective for up to 20 years of ground stabilization. Now, the new research is the first to look at its environmental and economic impacts, finding that there are clear environmental benefits to choosing microbially induced desaturation over permeation grouting.
“Greenhouse gas emissions produced by microbially induced desaturation are less than four percent of what is produced from permeation grouting” because of grouting’s heavy use of carbon- and water-intensive cement, said Aisha Faruqi, lead researcher of this study and an industrial ecologist at the University of California, Davis.
Unlike permeation grouting, microbially induced desaturation uses on-site groundwater without requiring additional water resources. Producing cement for permeation grouting requires twice as much water as microbial-induced desaturation and is typically pumped into the construction site from the same reservoirs that supply drinking water, according to Faruqi. It also costs about twice as much, she found.
“Microbially induced desaturation is a more sustainable alternative to hazard mitigation,” Faruqi said. “It outperforms permeation grouting across various impacts, including global warming potential and cost.”
Contributed by Kirsten Steinke
AGU (www.agu.org) is a global community supporting more than half a million advocates and professionals in Earth and space sciences. Through broad and inclusive partnerships, AGU aims to advance discovery and solution science that accelerate knowledge and create solutions that are ethical, unbiased and respectful of communities and their values. Our programs include serving as a scholarly publisher, convening virtual and in-person events and providing career support. We live our values in everything we do, such as our net zero energy renovated building in Washington, D.C. and our Ethics and Equity Center, which fosters a diverse and inclusive geoscience community to ensure responsible conduct.
Notes for Journalists:
Aisha Faruqi will present this work at AGU Fall Meeting 2022. For information about Fall Meeting 2022, including the schedule of press events, visit the online Media Center. Neither the presentation nor this press release is under embargo.
NH35C-0509 — A Life Cycle Assessment of Bio-mediated Earthquake Hazard Mitigation to Improve Infrastructure Resiliency
NH35C — Geohazards and Society: Striving Toward Improved Natural Hazard Resilience for All III Poster
Wednesday, 14 December, 15:45 – 19:15 CT
- Aisha Faruqi, (corresponding author), University of California, Davis
- Caitlyn A Hall, University of Arizona
- Alissa Kendall, University of California, Davis
- Leon van Paassen, Boskalis Construction Company
- Ed Kavazanjian, Arizona State University