24 March 2020
Pollution from ships creates lines of clouds that can stretch hundreds of miles in this satellite image taken 16 January 2018, off the coast of Europe. The narrower ends of the clouds are youngest, while the broader, wavier ends are older.
Credit: NASA Earth Observatory
University of Washington contact:
Hannah Hickey, +1 (206) 543-2580, [email protected]
AGU contact:
Liza Lester, +1 (202) 777-7494, [email protected]
Contact information for the researchers:
Michael Diamond, University of Washington [email protected];
Rob Wood, University of Washington, [email protected];
Hannah Director, University of Washington [email protected].
WASHINGTON—A container ship leaves a trail of white clouds in its wake that can linger in the air for hours, according to a new study. This puffy line is not just exhaust from the engine, but a change in the clouds that’s caused by small airborne particles of pollution.
The new research is the first to measure this phenomenon’s effect over years and at a regional scale. Satellite data over a shipping lane in the south Atlantic show that the ships modify clouds to block an additional 2 Watts of solar energy, on average, from reaching each square meter of ocean surface near the shipping lane.
The result implies that globally, cloud changes caused by particles from all forms of industrial pollution block 1 Watt of solar energy per square meter of Earth’s surface, masking almost a third of the present-day warming from greenhouse gases.
The new, open-access study was published in AGU Advances and is one of the first papers published in this highly selective journal of full length, high-impact research articles across all of Earth and space science.
“In climate models, if you simulate the world with sulfur emissions from shipping, and you simulate the world without these emissions, there is a pretty sizable cooling effect from changes in the model clouds due to shipping,” said first author Michael Diamond, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Washington. “But because there’s so much natural variability it’s been hard to see this effect in observations of the real world.”
The new study uses observations from 2003 to 2015 in spring, the cloudiest season, over the shipping route between Europe and South Africa. This path is also part of a popular open-ocean shipping route between Europe and Asia.
Seeding clouds
Small particles in exhaust from burning fossil fuels creates “seeds” on which water vapor in the air can condense into cloud droplets. More particles of airborne sulfate or other material leads to clouds with more small droplets, compared to the same amount of water condensed into fewer, bigger droplets. This makes the clouds brighter, or more reflective.
Past attempts to measure this effect from ships had focused on places where the wind blows across the shipping lane, in order to compare the “clean” area upwind with the “polluted” area downstream. But in this study researchers focused on an area that had previously been excluded: a place where the wind blows along the shipping lane, keeping pollution concentrated in that small area.
(Left) Cloud droplet concentrations from 2003 to 2015 averaged over the months of September, October and November, as observed by NASA satellites. (Right) The expected concentration of cloud droplets without emissions along the shipping route (yellow line) calculated by the new study. The difference helps explain how much industrial pollution influences clouds.
Credit: Michael Diamond/University of Washington
The study analyzed cloud properties detected over 12 years by the MODIS instrument on NASA satellites and the amount of reflected sunlight at the top of the atmosphere from the CERES group of satellite instruments. The authors compared cloud properties inside the shipping route with an estimate of what those cloud properties would have been in the absence of shipping based on statistics from nearby, unpolluted areas.
“The difference inside the shipping lane is small enough that we need about six years of data to confirm that it is real,” said co-author Hannah Director, a statistician at the University of Washington. “However, if this small change occurred worldwide, it would be enough to affect global temperatures.”
Once they could measure the ship emissions’ effect on solar radiation, the researchers used that number to estimate how much cloud brightening from all industrial pollution has affected the climate overall.
Global effects
Averaged globally, the researchers found changes in low clouds due to pollution from all sources block 1 Watt per square meter of solar energy—compared to the roughly 3 Watts per square meter trapped today by the greenhouse gases also emitted by industrial activities.
Without the cooling effect of pollution-seeded clouds, Earth might have already warmed by 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit), a change that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projects would have significant societal impacts. For comparison, today the Earth is estimated to have warmed by approximately 1 degree Celsius (1.8 Fahrenheit) since the late 1800s.
“I think the biggest contribution of this study is our ability to generalize, to calculate a global assessment of the overall impact of sulfate pollution on low clouds,” said co-author Rob Wood, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Washington.
The results also have implications for one possible mechanism of deliberate climate intervention. They suggest that strategies to temporarily slow global warming by spraying salt particles to make low-level marine clouds more reflective, known as marine cloud brightening, might be effective. But they also imply these changes could take years to be easily observed.
“What this study doesn’t tell us at all is: Is marine cloud brightening a good idea? Should we do it? There’s a lot more research that needs to go into that, including from the social sciences and humanities,” Diamond said. “It does tell us that these effects are possible — and on a more cautionary note, that these effects might be difficult to confidently detect.”
Other co-authors are Ryan Eastman, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Washington, and Anna Possner at Goethe University in Frankfurt. The research was funded by NASA and the National Science Foundation.
###
AGU (www.agu.org) is an international association of more than 60,000 advocates and experts in Earth and space science. Through our initiatives, such as mentoring, professional development and awards, AGU members uphold and foster an inclusive and diverse scientific community. AGU also hosts numerous conferences, including the largest international Earth and space science meeting as well as serving as the leading publisher of the highest quality journals. Fundamental to our mission since our founding in 1919 is to live our values, which we do through our net zero energy building in Washington, D.C. and making the scientific discoveries and research accessible and engaging to all to help protect society and prepare global citizens for the challenges and opportunities ahead.
Notes for Journalists
This paper is open access. Journalists and public information officers (PIOs) can download a PDF copy of the article by clicking on this link: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2019AV000111
Full-size imagery accompanying this press release can be found here: https://aguorg.sharepoint.com/:f:/s/newsroom/EgSS2LMwfoNBgS-sWKeTfKoBhLNvowVI8SyAHSjcOsHpcw
AGU Advances is a gold open-access journal that publishes high-impact, novel, and timely scientific advances across all the Earth and space science and related interdisciplinary topics. Papers are expected to have broad and immediate implications to researchers in other Earth and space science disciplines, the broader science community, and the public. For more information about AGU’s newest journal, read this editorial by Editor-in-Chief Susan Trumbore.
Journalists and PIOs may also request a copy of the final paper by emailing Liza Lester at [email protected]. Please provide your name, the name of your publication, and your phone number.
Neither the paper nor this press release is under embargo.
Paper Title
“Substantial Cloud Brightening From Shipping in Subtropical Low Clouds”
Authors
Michael S. Diamond and Hannah M. Director, Department of Atmospheric Sciences and Program on Climate Change University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Ryan Eastman and Robert Wood, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Anna Possner, Institute for Atmosphere and Environmental Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany