Wildfires pollute much more than previously thought

14 June 2017

Joint Release

WASHINGTON, DC — Summer wildfires boost air pollution considerably more than previously believed.

Naturally burning timber and brush launch what are called fine particles into the air at a rate three times as high as levels noted in emissions inventories at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, according to a new study. The microscopic specks that form aerosols are a hazard to human health, particularly to the lungs and heart.

“Burning biomass produces lots of pollution. These are really bad aerosols to breathe from a health point of view,” said Greg Huey, an atmospheric scientist at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta and lead author of the new study published today in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, a publication of the American Geophysical Union. The research also describes other chemicals in wildfire smoke, some never before measured, and it raises the estimated annual emission of particulate matter in the western United States significantly.

The previous EPA data had been based on plume samples taken in controlled burns ignited by forestry professionals. Measuring plumes so thoroughly, from the sky, directly in the thick of a wildfire had not been possible before this study.

The Whitewater-Baldy Complex wildfire in Gila National Forest, New Mexico, as it burned on June 6th, 2012. Scientists calculate that high fire years like 2012 are likely occur two to four times per decade by mid-century, instead of once per decade under current climate conditions.
Credit: Kari Greer/USFS Gila National Forest. 

Plunging into the plume

Unique research missions deployed planes to plow through the plumes of three major wildfires, including the 2013 Rim Fire, the third largest wildfire in California history.  An ensemble of instruments protruding from the flanks of NASA and U.S. Department of Energy aircraft allowed teams of researchers on board to measure chemicals and particles in real time and cull masses of data, which the new study is based on.

“We actually went to measure, right above the fire, what was coming out,” Huey said.

Bob Yokelson, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Montana in Missoula has taken a leadership role in many aspects of the research and was in a group of about 20 scientists who selected the instruments to be installed on the large NASA plane. “We really didn’t have to go without anything we wanted really badly,” he said. Yokelson also helped design the flight paths.

Georgia Tech also had instruments and scientists on the NASA DC-8 plane. Researchers associated with a total of more than a dozen universities and organizations participated in data collection or analysis.

“This paper is expected to serve as a basis for the next NASA fire chemical monitoring mission,” Huey said.

Researchers gathered data from instruments on board the NASA DC-8 plane to measure chemicals and particles in real time and cull masses of data, which the new study is based on.
Credit: NASA Kent Shiffer

Refinery in flames

Methanol, benzene, ozone precursors and other noxious emissions collected from wildfire plumes may make it sound like an oil refinery went up in flames. That’s not so far-fetched, as oil and other fossil fuels derive from ancient biomass.

“You can see the smoke, and it’s dark for a reason,” Huey said. “When you go measuring wildfires, you get everything there is to measure. You start to wonder sometimes what all is in there.”

The study found many organic chemicals in the wildfire plumes and technological advancements allowed the researchers to detect certain nitrates in the smoke for the first time. But burning biomass does not appear to be a dominant source of these chemical pollutants, and the major findings of the study involved the fine particles.

Particulate matter, some of which contains oxidants that cause genetic damage, are in the resulting aerosols. They can drift over long distances into populated areas.

People are exposed to harmful aerosols from industrial sources, too, but fires produce more aerosol per amount of fuel burned. “Cars and power plants with pollution controls burn things much more cleanly,” Huey said.

Various aerosols also rise in the atmosphere, but their net effect on global warming or cooling is still uncertain, as some aerosols reflect sunlight away from Earth, and others, in contrast, trap warmth in the atmosphere.

Prescribed burnings

As global warming pushes wildfires to grow in size and number, the ensuing pollution stands to grow along with them. Stepping up professionally controlled man-made burnings may help cut these emissions, the study suggests.

So-called prescribed burnings prevent or reduce wildfires, and they appear to produce far less pollution per unit area than wildfires, the study said.

“A prescribed fire might burn five tons of biomass fuel per acre, whereas a wildfire might burn 30,” said Yokelson, who has dedicated decades of research to biomass fires. “This study shows that wildfires also emit three times more aerosol per ton of fuel burned than prescribed fires.”

While still more needs to be known about professional prescribed burnings’ emissions, this new research makes clear that wildfires burn much more and pollute much more. The data will also help improve overall estimates of wildfire emissions.

Fire prevention professionals follow stringent rules to carry out prescribed burns to avoid calamity and pollution downwind into populated areas. The researchers do not recommend the burning of biomass by inexperienced people, as it contributes to air pollution and can trigger tragic blazes, including wildfires.

A group photo of SEAC4RS DC-8 at the end of the mission.
Credit: NASA/Kent Shiffer. 

Daunting flights

Experiments like these in real natural disasters are uncommon not only because of the rarity of assembling such great instruments and taking them airborne. The flights can also be dangerous. Plumes are not only filled with toxins, but their turbulence tosses planes around, shaking up technology and researchers.

“The smoke leaks into the cabin and makes you nauseous,” said Yokelson, who started flying plume missions many years ago. “You’re trying to take notes, run your instrument, look at the fire, talk on the headset, and get pictures. And at the same time, it’s crazy bumpy. Normally, if you’re in a smaller plane, your stomach is not too happy.”

Also, wildfires pop up unannounced, so flight schedules must be hammered out on short notice around strict regulations that normally prohibit flights near wildfires. Research aircraft also have to coordinate with regional authorities to avoid crossing paths with fire-fighting planes.

The rare data the flights from NASA’s SEAC4RS mission and the Department of Energy’s BBOP mission have provided stand to greatly increase understanding of the pollutants naturally burning biomass flings into the air. The insights should stoke the discussion on how to mitigate the wildfires, which are on the rise on our warming planet.


The American Geophysical Union is dedicated to advancing the Earth and space sciences for the benefit of humanity through its scholarly publications, conferences, and outreach programs. AGU is a not-for-profit, professional, scientific organization representing 60,000 members in 137 countries. Join the conversation on FacebookTwitterYouTube, and our other social media channels.

Notes for Journalists

This research article is open access for 30 days. A PDF copy of the article can be downloaded at the following link: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016JD026315/pdf.

Journalists and PIOs may also order a copy of the final paper by emailing a request to Lauren Lipuma at [email protected]. Please provide your name, the name of your publication, and your phone number.

Neither the paper nor this press release is under embargo.


“Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications”


Xiaoxi Liu: School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.;

Greg Huey: School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.;

Robert J. Yokelson: Department of Chemistry, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, U.S.A.;

Vanessa Selimovic: Department of Chemistry, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, U.S.A.;

Isobel J. Simpson: Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California U.S.A.;

Markus Müller: Department of Chemistry, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, U.S.A. and Institute for Ion Physics and Applied Physics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria;

Jose Jimenez: Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A. and Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A.;

Pedro Campuzano-Jost: Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A. and Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A.

For complete list of authors, please see the article.

Contact information for the authors:
Greg Huey: [email protected], +1 (404) 385-2996

Bob Yokelson: [email protected], +1 (406) 243-6088

AGU Contact:

Lauren Lipuma
+1 (202) 777-7396
[email protected]

Georgia Tech Press Contact:
Ben Brumfield
+1 (404) 660-1408
[email protected]