A third of the world’s biggest groundwater basins are in distress

Reserves likely far smaller than previously thought, new studies find

16 June 2015

Joint Release

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Human consumption is rapidly draining about a third of its largest groundwater basins, despite having little to no accurate data about how much water remains in them, according to two new studies led by the University of California, Irvine, using data from NASA’s Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites.

The result is that significant segments of Earth’s population are consuming groundwater quickly without knowing when it might run out, the researchers conclude. The new findings have been accepted for publication in Water Resources Research, a journal of the American Geophysical Union, and appear online today.

“Available physical and chemical measurements are simply insufficient,” said University of California Irvine professor and principal investigator Jay Famiglietti, who is also the senior water scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. “Given how quickly we are consuming the world’s groundwater reserves, we need a coordinated global effort to determine how much is left.”

Depletion_labels

Groundwater storage trends for Earth’s 37 largest aquifers from UCI-led study using NASA GRACE data (2003 – 2013). Of these, 21 have exceeded sustainability tipping points and are being depleted, with 13 considered significantly distressed, threatening regional water security and resilience. Credit: UC Irvine / NASA

The studies are the first to characterize groundwater losses via data from space, using readings generated by NASA’s twin Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites that measure dips and bumps in Earth’s gravity, which is affected by the weight of water.

For the first paper, researchers examined the planet’s 37 largest aquifers between 2003 and 2013. The eight worst off were classified as overstressed, with nearly no natural replenishment to offset usage. Another five aquifers were found, in descending order, to be extremely or highly stressed, depending upon the level of replenishment in each – still in trouble but with some water flowing back into them.

The most overburdened are in the world’s driest areas, which draw heavily on underground water. Climate change and population growth are expected to intensify the problem.

“What happens when a highly stressed aquifer is located in a region with socioeconomic or political tensions that can’t supplement declining water supplies fast enough?” asked the lead author on both studies, Alexandra Richey, who conducted the research as a UCI doctoral student. “We’re trying to raise red flags now to pinpoint where active management today could protect future lives and livelihoods.”

The research team – which included co-authors from NASA, the National Center for Atmospheric Research, National Taiwan University and UC Santa Barbara – found that the Arabian Aquifer System, an important water source for more than 60 million people, is the most overstressed in the world.

The Indus Basin aquifer of northwestern India and Pakistan is the second-most overstressed, and the Murzuk-Djado Basin in northern Africa is third. California’s Central Valley, utilized heavily for agriculture and suffering rapid depletion, was slightly better off but still labeled highly stressed in the first study.

“As we’re seeing in California right now, we rely much more heavily on groundwater during drought,” Famiglietti said. “When examining the sustainability of a region’s water resources, we absolutely must account for that dependence.”

In a companion paper appearing online today in the same journal, the scientists conclude that the total remaining volume of the world’s usable groundwater is poorly known, with often widely varying estimates, but is likely far less than rudimentary estimates made decades ago.

By comparing their satellite-derived groundwater loss rates to what little data exists on groundwater availability, they found major discrepancies in projected “time to depletion.” In the overstressed Northwest Sahara Aquifer System, for example, this fluctuated between 10 and 21,000 years.

“We don’t actually know how much is stored in each of these aquifers. Estimates of remaining storage might vary from decades to millennia,” Richey said. “In a water-scarce society, we can no longer tolerate this level of uncertainty, especially since groundwater is disappearing so rapidly.”

The study notes that the dearth of groundwater is already leading to significant ecological damage, including depleted rivers, declining water quality and subsiding land.

Groundwater aquifers are typically located in soil or deeper rock layers beneath Earth’s surface. The depth and thickness of many make it tough and costly to drill to or otherwise reach bedrock and learn where the moisture bottoms out. But it has to be done, according to the authors.

###

The American Geophysical Union is dedicated to advancing the Earth and space sciences for the benefit of humanity through its scholarly publications, conferences, and outreach programs. AGU is a not-for-profit, professional, scientific organization representing more than 60,000 members in 139 countries. Join the conversation on FacebookTwitterYouTube, and our other social media channels.


PDF copies of the articles are available for free by clicking on these links:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR017349/abstract?campaign=wlytk-41855.5282060185

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR017351/abstract?campaign=wlytk-41855.5282060185

Or, you may order a copy of the final papers by emailing your request to Nanci Bompey at nbompey@agu.org. Please provide your name, the name of your publication, and your phone number.

Neither the papers nor this press release is under embargo.

Title

“Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE” and “Uncertainty in global groundwater storage estimates in a total groundwater stress framework”

Authors:

“Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE”

Alexandra S. Richey: Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA;

Brian F. Thomas: NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA;

Min-Hui Lo: Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan;

John T. Reager: NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA;

James S. Famiglietti: Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA; NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA; and Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA;

Katalyn Voss: Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA;

Sean Swenson: Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA;

Matthew Rodell: Hydrologic Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.

 “Uncertainty in global groundwater storage estimates in a total groundwater stress framework”

Alexandra S. Richey: Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA;

Brian F. Thomas: NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA;

Min-Hui Lo: Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan;

James S. Famiglietti: Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA; NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA; and Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA;

Sean Swenson: Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA;

Matthew Rodell: Hydrologic Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.

Jay Famiglietti, +1 (626) 755-7661, James.Famiglietti@jpl.nasa.gov


AGU Contact:

Nanci Bompey
+1 (202) 777-7524
nbompey@agu.org

University of California Irvine Contact:
Janet Wilson
+1 (949) 824-3969
janethw@uci.edu

NASA JPL Contact:
Alan Buis
+1 (818) 354-0474
alan.buis@jpl.nasa.gov