Ethanol refining may release more of some pollutants than previously thought

5 May 2015

Joint Release

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Ethanol fuel refineries could be releasing much larger amounts of some ozone-forming compounds into the atmosphere than current assessments suggest, according to a new study that found emissions of these chemicals at a major ethanol fuel refinery are many times higher than government estimates.

Archer Daniels Midland’s Agricultural Processing and Biofuels Plant, in Decatur, IL. A new study finds emissions of some ozone-forming compounds downwind of the plant are many times higher than government estimates, suggesting that ethanol fuel refineries could be releasing much larger amounts of these chemicals than currently thought.  Credit: U.S. Department of Energy

Archer Daniels Midland’s Agricultural Processing
and Biofuels Plant, in Decatur, IL. A new study finds emissions of some ozone-forming compounds downwind of the plant are many times higher than government estimates, suggesting that ethanol fuel refineries could be releasing much larger amounts of these chemicals than currently thought.
Credit: U.S. Department of Energy

New airborne measurements downwind from an ethanol fuel refinery in Decatur, Illinois, show that ethanol emissions are 30 times higher than government estimates. The measurements also show emissions of all volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which include ethanol, were five times higher than government numbers, which estimate emissions based on manufacturing information. VOCs and nitrogen oxides react with sunlight to form ground-level ozone, the main component of smog.

If emissions at the more than 200 fuel ethanol refineries in the U.S. are also being underestimated, these plants could be a higher source of VOC emissions than currently thought, according to the new findings accepted for publication in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, a publication of the American Geophysical Union.

Ethanol, a renewable transportation fuel made from corn, constitutes approximately 10 percent of the fuel used in gasoline vehicles in the U.S., according to the new study. The renewable fuel standard mandating the use of ethanol and other renewable fuels aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and petroleum imports, while encouraging development and expansion of the U.S. renewable fuels sector, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The new study is one of the first and most detailed investigations of emissions from ethanol fuel refining, according to its lead author Joost de Gouw, a scientist at the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder and NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder, Colorado. Information about the refining process is one piece of examining the entire lifecycle of ethanol fuel emissions, from growing the corn used to make the fuel to the effect of emissions on urban air quality, he said.

“Over the past decade, because of the renewable fuel mandate, we have added 10 percent of ethanol to all the gasoline that is sold in the U.S. and so the question is: what does that do to the environment,” de Gouw said. “That is a very complicated question and it has many different aspects. One of the aspects is the air-quality implications and, to get at them, we have to know what are the emissions associated with producing ethanol and using ethanol. That is where this study fits in.”

Corn fields near Decatur, Illinois, photographed from a NOAA research aircraft. Scientists flew the airplane downwind of an Archer Daniels Midland ethanol refinery in 2013. Air-quality readings at three different distances from the plant were used to calculate emissions of various gases, including VOCs, nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, outlined in a new study.  Credit: Joost de Gouw

Corn fields near Decatur, Illinois, photographed from a NOAA research aircraft that scientists flew downwind of an Archer Daniels Midland ethanol refinery in 2013. Air-quality readings at three different distances from the plant were used to calculate emissions of various gases, including VOCs, nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, outlined in a new study.
Credit: Joost de Gouw

To make the measurements they report, de Gouw and his colleagues flew an airplane downwind of an Archer Daniels Midland ethanol refinery, the third largest producer of fuel ethanol in the U.S., and took air-quality readings at three different distances from the plant. The researchers used those to calculate emissions of various gases, including VOCs, nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide.

They then compared their findings with government emissions estimates from 2011. Emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides – compounds generated by the coal-burning plant – were in-line with government estimates, but emissions of VOCs, including ethanol, were higher than government estimates. De Gouw said the VOC emissions are likely generated by the refining process, not the coal-burning that powers it.

The researchers also used government estimates and ethanol production numbers from the Renewable Fuels Association to analyze emissions from all fuel ethanol refineries in the U.S. and compare those to emissions from burning ethanol in motor vehicles.

Prevailing estimates had indicated that refining ethanol fuel and burning it in cars and trucks generate equivalent amount of VOCs, including ethanol. But, the new emissions measurements from the Decatur plant show that ethanol emissions from production of one kilogram of ethanol at the refinery are 170 times higher than what comes out of a vehicle burning the same amount of ethanol, de Gouw said.  If the Decatur refinery is like most other refineries in the U.S., he added, “the higher emissions of ethanol and VOCs that we calculated from our data would make the refining process a larger source of these gases than burning the ethanol fuel in your car.”

“Obviously, this was just one refinery that we looked at, so we’d like to do more and see if these findings are more universal or if this plant was just exceptional,” de Gouw added.

The new study points to the need for more measurements of emissions coming from ethanol fuel refineries, said Dylan Millet, an associate professor of atmospheric chemistry at the University of Minnesota in St. Paul. He was not involved with the new research. Additional observational data will help scientists better understand the emissions and their impact on air quality, he said.

“If we are going to accurately assess the air-quality implications of our fuel choices, then these are important emissions to know,” Millet said.

###

The American Geophysical Union is dedicated to advancing the Earth and space sciences for the benefit of humanity through its scholarly publications, conferences, and outreach programs. AGU is a not-for-profit, professional, scientific organization representing more than 60,000 members in 139 countries. Join the conversation onFacebookTwitterYouTube, and our other social media channels.


Notes for Journalists
Journalists and public information officers (PIOs) of educational and scientific institutions who have registered with AGU can download a PDF copy of the article by clicking on this link: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015JD023138/full?campaign=wlytk-41855.5282060185

Or, you may order a copy of the final paper by emailing your request to Peter Weiss at pweiss@agu.org. Please provide your name, the name of your publication, and your phone number.

Neither the papers nor this press release is under embargo.

Title

“Airborne Measurements of the Atmospheric Emissions from a Fuel Ethanol Refinery”

Authors:
J.A. de Gouw: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO; and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO;

S.A. McKeen and K.C. Aikin: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO; and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO;

C.A. Brock and S.S. Brown: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO;

J.B. Gilman: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO; and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO;

M. Graus: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO; and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO; Now with: University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria;

T. Hanisco: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD;

J.S. Holloway: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO; and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO;

J. Kaiser: University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI;

F.N. Keutsch: Harvard University, Cambridge, MA;

B.M. Lerner and J. Liao: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO; and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO;

M.Z. Markovic: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO; and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO; Now with: Air Quality Processes Research Division, Environment Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada;

A.M. Middlebrook: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO;

K.-E. Min: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO; and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO; Now with: Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, South Korea;

J.A. Neuman: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO; and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO;

J.B. Nowak: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO; and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO; Now with: Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, MA;

J. Peischl and I.B. Pollack: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO; and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO;

J.M. Roberts, T.B. Ryerson, and M. Trainer: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO;

P.R. Veres and C. Warneke: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO; and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO;

A. Welti: ETH Zürich, Switzerland;

G.M. Wolfe: Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD.

Contact Information for the Authors:
Joost de Gouw: +1 (303) 497-3878, Email: joost.degouw@noaa.gov


AGU Contact:

Peter Weiss
+1 (202) 777-7507
pweiss@agu.org

CIRES Contact:
Katy Human
+1 (303) 735-0196
Kathleen.human@colorado.edu

NASA Contact:
Patrick Lynch
+1 (757) 897-2047
patrick.lynch@nasa.gov